Impact of gender, ethnicity and social deprivation on access to surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a retrospective database study in England

Caoimhe T Rice; Sophie Barnett; Shea P O'Connell; Enoch Akowuah; Clare E Appleby; John B Chambers; Benoy N Shah; Daniel J Blackman

doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002373

Impact of gender, ethnicity and social deprivation on access to surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a retrospective database study in England

Open Heart. 2023 Sep;10(2):e002373. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002373.

Authors

Caoimhe T Rice¹, Sophie Barnett², Shea P O'Connell¹, Enoch Akowuah³, Clare E Appleby⁴, John B Chambers⁵, Benoy N Shah⁶, Daniel J Blackman⁷

Affiliations

¹ Specialty EMR Data, Corevitas, London, UK.
² Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland sophie.barnett@medtronic.com.
³ South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
⁴ Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
⁵ Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
⁶ University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
⁷ Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Objective: To assess gender, ethnicity, and deprivation-based differences in provision of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in England for adults with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: We retrospectively identified adults with AS from the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between April 2016 and March 2019 and those who subsequently had an AVR. We separately used HES-linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to identify people with AVR and evaluate the timeliness of their procedure (CPRD-AVR cohort). ORs for AVR in people with an AS diagnosis were estimated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, region and comorbidity. AVR was considered timely if performed electively and without evidence of cardiac decompensation before AVR.

Results: 183 591 adults with AS were identified in HES; of these, 31 436 underwent AVR. The CPRD-AVR cohort comprised 10 069 adults. Women had lower odds of receiving AVR compared with men (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.66); as did people of black (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82) or South Asian (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.82) compared with people of white ethnicities. People in the most deprived areas were less likely to receive AVR than the least deprived areas (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). Timely AVR occurred in 65% of those of white ethnicities compared with 55% of both those of black and South Asian ethnicities. 77% of the least deprived had a timely procedure compared with 58% of the most deprived; there was no gender difference.

Conclusions: In this large, national dataset, female gender, black or South Asian ethnicities and high deprivation were associated with significantly reduced odds of receiving AVR in England. A lower proportion of people of minority ethnicities or high deprivation had a timely procedure. Public health initiatives may be required to increase clinician and public awareness of unconscious biases towards minority and vulnerable populations to ensure timely AVR for everyone.

Keywords: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Delivery of Health Care; Electronic Health Records; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

MeSH terms

Aortic Valve Stenosis* / diagnosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis* / surgery
Ethnicity
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation* / methods
Humans
Male
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Social Deprivation
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / adverse effects