Multi-response optimisation analysis of material properties in dental restorative composites under the influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli - A 3D finite element study

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Feb:150:106363. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106363. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

Abstract

Objectives: Restored teeth undergo more damage than intact teeth. Therefore, the scientific investigation of their mechanical and physical behaviour under varying oral conditions is vital. The current study is to numerically investigate the stresses on a class-II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) restored molar due to thermal and thermomechanical stimuli with varying input properties such as coefficient of thermal expansion and elastic properties. This is performed to optimise the dental restoration material, thereby reducing the stresses and failure of the restoration.

Methods: An upper molar was scanned using μ-CT for segmenting and modelling the enamel and dentine. A class-II MOD cavity was then prepared on the model, after which non-manifold meshing was generated. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and elastic modulus (E) properties of the restoration were varied from 20 × 10-6 °C-1 to 55 × 10-6 °C-1 and 5 GPa-20 GPa, respectively. After the material properties and boundary conditions were set for the finite element (FE) analysis, the thermal and thermomechanical loading analyses were performed to demonstrate the influence of input parameters on the stress. The maximum values of principal stresses on the restoration-enamel junction and the restoration were evaluated. The results were statistically processed using analysis of variance, response surface methodology (RSM) and optimisation analysis to estimate the most optimum inputs for minimising principal stresses.

Results: The study reveals that the location of principal stress occurs at the restoration-enamel junction (REJ) and the restoration changes based on the composite material value of E and CTE due to thermal and thermomechanical stimuli. The REJ showed higher principal stress than restoration during the application of both thermal and thermomechanical stimuli, making it more vulnerable to fracture and failure. Moreover, the study showed non-linear variations in the values and locations of principal stresses due to thermal and thermomechanical stimuli with the change in the property of the restoration composite used. Finally, this study derived an optimised restorative value for CTE and E due to the application of thermal and simultaneous thermal and mechanical stimuli.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of choosing the suitable material properties of the restoration composite by dental clinicians to repair a large class MOD cavity. The findings from this study also suggest that the difference in the values of E and CTE in a dental restoration composite when compared with the enamel causes a lack of uniformity in mechanical and thermal properties, thereby forming stress concentrations at the interfaces. The study establishes two optimised CTE and E values for the MOD restoration composite as 25 × 10-6 °C-1 and 20 GPa and 37 × 10-6 °C-1 and 5 GPa, respectively.

Keywords: Dental restorations; Finite element method; Interfacial stress; Optimisation; Restoration-enamel junction; Restorative composites.

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Elastic Modulus
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Molar* / physiology
  • Stress, Mechanical

Substances

  • Composite Resins