Should tobacco sales be restricted to state-run alcohol outlets? Perspectives from 10 US alcohol control states

Addiction. 2024 Jun;119(6):1048-1058. doi: 10.1111/add.16467. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

Abstract

Background and aims: The ubiquity of tobacco retailers helps to sustain the tobacco epidemic. A tobacco retail reduction approach that has not been tried is transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS), which are limited in number and operate under some restrictions, e.g. regarding opening hours or marketing materials. This study summarizes policy experts' and advocates' views of TTS, including (1) advantages and disadvantages; (2) feasibility; and (3) potential implementation obstacles.

Design: This study was a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Ten US states with alcoholic beverage control systems were included.

Participants: The participants comprised a total of 103 tobacco control advocates and professionals, public health officials, alcohol policy experts and alcohol control system representatives, including two tribal community representatives.

Measurements: Interviewees' perspectives on their state's alcoholic beverage control agency (ABC, the agency that oversees or operates a state alcohol monopoly) and on TTS were assessed.

Findings: Interviewees thought TTS offered potential advantages, including reduced access to tobacco products, less exposure to tobacco advertising and a greater likelihood of successful smoking cessation. Some saw potential long-term health benefits for communities of color, due to the smaller number of state alcohol stores in those communities. Interviewees also raised concerns regarding TTS, including ABCs' limited focus on public health and emphasis on revenue generation, which could conflict with tobacco use reduction efforts. Some interviewees thought TTS could enhance the power of the tobacco and alcohol industries, increase calls for alcohol system privatization or create difficulties for those in recovery.

Conclusions: In the United States, transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS) could have a positive public health impact by reducing tobacco availability, marketing exposure and, ultimately, tobacco use. However, tensions exist between alcohol control system goals of providing revenue to the state and protecting public health. Should a state decide to pursue TTS, several guardrails should be established, including building into the legislation an explicit goal of reducing tobacco consumption.

Keywords: Alcohol control states; qualitative research; retail policy; tobacco end‐game; tobacco industry; tobacco policy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alcohol Drinking / epidemiology
  • Alcoholic Beverages* / economics
  • Alcoholic Beverages* / supply & distribution
  • Commerce* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • Marketing / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Qualitative Research
  • State Government
  • Tobacco Products / economics
  • Tobacco Products / legislation & jurisprudence
  • United States