Assessment of the risk of developing type 2 diabetes using the Indian diabetes risk score in an urban community in Chandigarh, India: A cross-sectional study

Shaily Dandona; Naman Tuteja; Naveen K Goel; Meenu Kalia; Dinesh Walia

doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_573_23

Assessment of the risk of developing type 2 diabetes using the Indian diabetes risk score in an urban community in Chandigarh, India: A cross-sectional study

J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22:12:433. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_573_23. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Shaily Dandona¹, Naman Tuteja², Naveen K Goel³, Meenu Kalia³, Dinesh Walia³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Community Medicine, North DMC Medical College and Hindu Rao Hospital, New Delhi, India.
² Department of Orthopaedics, North DMC Medical College and Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
³ Department of Community Medicine, GMCH-32, Chandigarh, India.

Abstract

Background: The urban poor is a group that is known to be vulnerable to the adoption of a more urbanized lifestyle that places them at a higher risk for diabetes. Identification of at-risk individuals using simple screening tools like the Indian diabetes risk score developed by Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (MDRF-IDRS) and appropriate lifestyle interventions could greatly help in preventing or postponing the onset of diabetes and thus reducing the burden of the disease on the community and the nation as a whole.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on individuals ≥30 years (n = 1533) of both genders in an urban colony of Chandigarh during a period of 1 year. A stratified two-stage systematic random sampling was adopted. The risk of developing Type 2 diabetes mellitus was assessed using IDRS. The total risk score of each participant was analyzed and compared. Biochemical investigations, including blood glucose and lipid profiles for detecting diabetes, were conducted. Data were presented in percentages and proportions. The statistical analysis of the data was performed by using the Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.

Results: The prevalence of diabetes was 3.1% in the present study. Overall, the mean IDRS was found to be 52.14 ± 16.01. Elderly persons aged 60 years and above had higher IDRS. IDRS showed significant variability with age (P < 0.001). Females had significantly higher IDRS as compared to males (P = 0.002). The association between socioeconomic class and risk status was highly significant statistically (P < 0.001). IDRS among individuals with diabetes was found to be significantly higher (64.29 ± 13.92) as compared to non-diabetics. Among all, 749 (48.7%) had high IDRS, whereas 54 (3.5%) had low IDRS. There were 734 (47.8%) with moderate IDRS.

Conclusion: IDRS was found to be highly sensitive for detecting the risk of diabetes, suggesting its potential use as a screening tool in community setup for the purpose of detecting diabetes.

Keywords: IDRS; risk; type 2 diabetes.