Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft Provides Excellent Clinical Outcomes, High Rates of Return to Play, and a Low Incidence of Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review

Liam A Peebles; Nigel O Blackwood; Arjun Verma; Michael J O'Brien; David M Lintner; Matthew J Kraeutler

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.045

Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft Provides Excellent Clinical Outcomes, High Rates of Return to Play, and a Low Incidence of Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review

Arthroscopy. 2024 Apr 7:S0749-8063(24)00268-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.045. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Liam A Peebles¹, Nigel O Blackwood², Arjun Verma², Michael J O'Brien³, David M Lintner⁴, Matthew J Kraeutler⁵

Affiliations

¹ Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.. Electronic address: lpeebles@tulane.edu.
² Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
⁴ Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
⁵ Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.

PMID: 38593928
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.045

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review evaluating clinical outcomes in patients undergoing medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (MUCLR) with soft-tissue allograft.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcomes evaluated were patient-reported outcome scores, return to play (RTP) rates, incidence of postoperative complications, and rates of graft rupture or mechanical failure.

Results: The literature search identified 395 articles, and 5 studies met final inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 274 patients were analyzed in the included studies and follow-up ranged from 3.0 to 7.6 years. Two studies (number of patients = 141) reported outcomes exclusively of MUCLR with allograft, whereas 3 studies (number of patients = 133) reported outcomes in patients undergoing MUCLR with either allograft or autograft. Allograft sources included gracilis, semitendinosus, plantaris, peroneus longus, and palmaris longus. Level of patient athletic competition ranged from recreational athletes to the professional level; however, nonathletes in the setting of trauma were also included. The RTP rate after MUCLR with soft-tissue allograft was 95.3%, and 89.3% of patients returned to a similar or greater level of play postoperatively. The Timmerman-Andrews score was reported in 2 studies, and the means postoperatively ranged from 94.55 to 97. Postoperative complication rates were low (range, 0% to 20%), and there were no reported incidences of allograft rupture or mechanical failure.

Conclusions: Based on the available data, soft-tissue allograft for MUCLR in athletic patient populations provides excellent clinical outcomes, high rates of RTP, and low rates of postoperative complications and graft failure at short-term follow-up. There remains a lack of high-quality evidence directly comparing autograft versus allograft outcomes in elite overhead-throwing athletes to support allograft as an acceptable alternative for MUCLR in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Publication types

Review