Restricting supply of tobacco products to pharmacies: a scoping review

Heewon Kang; Kathryn J Steadman; Janet Hoek; Wayne D Hall; Coral E Gartner

doi:10.1136/tc-2023-058486

Restricting supply of tobacco products to pharmacies: a scoping review

Tob Control. 2024 Apr 11:tc-2023-058486. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058486. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Heewon Kang^{1

2

3}, Kathryn J Steadman^{3

4}, Janet Hoek^{3

5}, Wayne D Hall⁶, Coral E Gartner^{7

3}

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
² School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
³ NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
⁴ School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
⁵ Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
⁶ National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
⁷ School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia c.gartner@uq.edu.au.

PMID: 38604768
DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058486

Abstract

Objective: We synthesised the published literature on proposals to restrict tobacco supply to pharmacies, covering (1) policy concept/rationale/attempts, (2) policy impact and implementation and (3) policy and research recommendations.

Data sources: We searched eight databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, IPA, ProQuest and OATD) for publications with at least an English-language abstract. We searched reference lists of included publications manually.

Study selection: One author screened all publications, and a second author reviewed a 10% subset. We focused on approaches to restrict the supply of tobacco products to pharmacies, without any restrictions on study design, location, participants or publication date.

Data extraction: Data extraction adhered to the JBI Scoping Review Methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Data synthesis: We included 18 publications. Among the 13 studies conducted in specific geographical contexts, 8 were from Aotearoa/New Zealand. Most publications (n=8) focused on effectiveness domains, indicating potential reductions in retailer density, smoking prevalence, disease burden, cost and increased opportunities for cessation advice. Seven explored policy acceptability among experts, pharmacists and people who smoke. Publications noted that pharmacy-only supply aligns with other programmes involving pharmacists, such as needle exchange programmes, but conflicts with efforts to phase out tobacco sales from the US and Canadian pharmacies.

Conclusions: Progress in tobacco retailing policy (eg, licensing, retailer incentives) and research (eg, assessment of policy equity and durability, application in other geographical contexts) are needed before a pharmacy-only tobacco supply model would be feasible.

Keywords: End game; Health Services; Public policy.