Objective: Despite effective treatment options, many families-especially those from marginalized backgrounds-lack access to quality care for their children's behavioral difficulties. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a prominent format for the delivery of outpatient services, with potential to increase access to quality care. Although telehealth-delivered parenting interventions are associated with positive clinical outcomes, limited research has examined whether telehealth formats improve treatment engagement relative to office-based care. The present study is the first controlled comparison of engagement across office-based parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and internet-delivered PCIT (iPCIT).
Method: Children ages 3-5 years, and their caregiver(s) (N = 40) participated in a randomized trial comparing iPCIT to office-based PCIT in the treatment of behavioral problems. Analyses examined the effects of treatment format on engagement (i.e., missed sessions, premature treatment discontinuation, homework completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment satisfaction). Logistic and linear regressions further explored whether treatment format moderated the effects of common predictors of treatment engagement (i.e., family economic means, racial/ethnic background, caregiver stress).
Results: iPCIT improved attendance rates relative to office-based PCIT, especially for families from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds. At the same time, among families with relatively higher levels of caregiver stress, office-based PCIT was associated with lower dropout rates and improved treatment alliance and satisfaction, relative to iPCIT.
Conclusions: This study provides the first experimental support that telehealth formats can improve treatment attendance in behavioral parenting interventions. Findings highlight nuances in treatment engagement across treatment formats that reveal limits to the extent telehealth transcends engagement concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).