Front-line and second-line treatment for mantle cell lymphoma in clinical practice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

Eur J Haematol. 2024 Apr 25. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14219. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: There are few reports of clinical practice treatment patterns and efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied a large, multicenter, cohort of patients with MCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 in eight institutions.

Results: 536 patients were registered (73% male, median of 70 years). Front-line treatment was based on high-dose cytarabine, bendamustine, and anthracyclines in 42%, 12%, and 15%, respectively. The median PFS for all patients was 45 months; 68, 34, and 30 months for those who received high-dose cytarabine-based, bendamustine-based and anthracycline-based therapy. 204 patients received second-line. Bendamustine-based treatment was the most common second-line regimen (36% of patients). The median second-line PFS (sPFS) for the entire cohort was 14 months; 19, 24, and 31 for bendamustine-, platinum-, and high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, with broad confidence intervals for these latter estimates. Patients treated with cytarabine-based therapies in the front-line and those with front-line PFS longer than 24 months had a substantially superior sPFS.

Conclusion: Front-line treatment in this cohort of MCL was as expected and with a median PFS of over 3.5 years. Second-line treatment strategies were heterogeneous and the median second-line PFS was little over 1 year.

Keywords: front‐line; mantle cell lymphoma; second‐line; survival; treatment.

Grants and funding