Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement

Curr Oncol. 2024 Mar 29;31(4):1803-1816. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040136.

Abstract

Patient access to new oncology drugs in Canada is only possible after navigating multiple sequential systemic checkpoints for national regulatory approval, health technology assessment (HTA) and collective government price negotiation. These steps delay access and prevent health care providers from being able to prescribe optimal therapy. Eighteen Canadian oncology clinicians from the medicine, nursing and pharmacy professions met to develop consensus recommendations for defining reasonable government performance standards around process and timeliness to improve Canadian cancer patients' access to best care. A modified Delphi methodology was used to identify consensus on 30 questions involving five themes: accountability, disparities, endpoints, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness. It was agreed that greater transparency is required across regulatory and HTA processes. Health professionals in oncology are frustrated for their patients because they are unable to deliver the modern guideline-supported therapies they want to provide due to delays in approval or funding. Canadian health care providers request improvements in timely access to life-saving therapeutics in line with other comparator countries. Clinicians expect urgent improvements in Canadian health systems to give our patients their best chance of survival.

Keywords: Canada; drug access; drug prices; health technology assessment; oncology drugs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Canada
  • Consensus
  • Health Services Accessibility*
  • Humans
  • Medical Oncology / standards
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents

Grants and funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this work from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Support was also received from Abbvie Canada, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Lilly, Merck and Novartis. Employees of 3Sixty Public Affairs Inc and their contracted writer and representatives of sponsoring organizations also attended the in-person session. None of these individuals participated in the voting.