Common Factors in Shoulder and Hip Arthroplasty Implant Failures: A Historical Review

J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 18;13(8):2370. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082370.

Abstract

In this era of subspecialty care in orthopedics, iterations of implant design can occur in a silo which then precludes gaining knowledge from failures of implant design that may have occurred in different subspecialties. This literature review describes the history of failures in hip and shoulder arthroplasties with the purpose of identifying similar factors that led to previous implant failures. A review of the literature was performed by two reviewers assessing articles that described failed hip and shoulder arthroplasty systems over time. We identified and analyzed 53 implant failures-23 in hip arthroplasty and 30 in shoulder arthroplasty. These failures were categorized as material, mechanical, and technical. In hip arthroplasty, 48% were material, 39% mechanical, and 13% technical failures. In shoulder arthroplasty, the distribution was 10% material, 70% mechanical, and 20% technical failures. The distribution of these failures highlights similar and sometimes repeated failure mechanisms between subspecialties. This accentuates the importance of a collaborative approach to improve future arthroplasty designs.

Keywords: THA; TSA; failure; hemiarthroplasty; hip arthroplasty; history of arthroplasty; revision; shoulder arthroplasty; total hip arthroplasty; total shoulder arthroplasty.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.