Tailoring the Mass Density of 3D Printing Materials for Accurate X-ray Imaging Simulation by Controlled Underfilling for Radiographic Phantoms

Polymers (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;16(8):1116. doi: 10.3390/polym16081116.

Abstract

Additive manufacturing and 3D printing allow for the design and rapid production of radiographic phantoms for X-ray imaging, including CT. These are used for numerous purposes, such as patient simulation, optimization of imaging procedures and dose levels, system evaluation and quality assurance. However, standard 3D printing polymers do not mimic X-ray attenuation properties of tissues like soft, adipose, lung or bone tissue, and standard materials like liquid water. The mass density of printing polymers-especially important in CT-is often inappropriate, i.e., mostly too high. Different methods can be applied to reduce mass density. This work examines reducing density by controlled underfilling either realized by using 3D printing materials expanded through foaming during heating in the printing process, or reducing polymer flow to introduce microscopic air-filled voids. The achievable density reduction depends on the base polymer used. When using foaming materials, density is controlled by the extrusion temperature, and ranges from 33 to 47% of the base polymer used, corresponding to a range of -650 to -394 HU in CT with 120 kV. Standard filaments (Nylon, modified PLA and modified ABS) allowed density reductions by 20 to 25%, covering HU values in CT from -260 to 77 (Nylon), -230 to -20 (ABS) and -81 to 143 (PLA). A standard chalk-filled PLA filament allowed reproduction of bone tissue in a wide range of bone mineral content resulting in CT numbers from 57 to 460 HU. Controlled underfilling allowed the production of radiographic phantom materials with continuously adjustable attenuation in a limited but appropriate range, allowing for the reproduction of X-ray attenuation properties of water, adipose, soft, lung, and bone tissue in an accurate, predictable and reproducible manner.

Keywords: 3D printing; X-ray imaging; additive manufacturing; computed tomography; medical imaging; radiographic phantoms; tissue equivalent materials.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.