Proton Beam Radiotherapy as a Curative Alternative to Radiofrequency Ablation for Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods: This study included 323 patients who underwent PBT (n=40) or RFA (n=283) as a curative treatment for previously untreated HCC between October 2016 and June 2021. The primary endpoints were local progression and toxicity.

Results: The median follow-up was 3.4 years (range=1.1-5.7 years). In terms of portal vein tumor thrombosis, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein, and prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence-II, the PBT group had significantly more severe tumor burdens than those of the RFA group (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.0004, and p<0.0001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in cumulative local progression rate (10.4% in PBT vs. 7.8% in RFA at 3-years, p=0.895). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported in only one patient (0.4%) after RFA. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not a significant prognostic factor for local progression (hazard ratio=1.05; 95% confidence interval=0.32-3.48; p=0.934).

Conclusion: PBT demonstrated comparable local control with acceptable toxicity to RFA in newly diagnosed HCC. Therefore, PBT may be a valid alternative.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; local control; proton beam radiotherapy; radiofrequency ablation; toxicity.