Objective: To characterize extremely negative online reviews of Otolaryngologists in the United States.
Methods: A search for reviews was performed on Yelp.com using the keyword "Otolaryngologist" in four major urban cities in the United States. On a five-star scale, one-star reviews were isolated, classified as clinical or non-clinical complaints, and further subcategorized. Chi-square analysis was used to determine differences in complaint types between patients reporting surgery and those who did not.
Results: From the 7653 reviews that were surveyed, 375 one-star reviews met the inclusion criteria and were used in the analysis. These negative reviews yielded 808 total complaints, 25 % were clinical, and 75 % were non-clinical. The most common clinical complaints were a lack of diagnosis, disagreement with the treatment plan and misdiagnosis, whereas the most common non-clinical complaints included poor physician bedside manner, cost, and unprofessional staff. Fifty-two (14 %) patients reported having surgery. The difference in the number of complaints by patients reporting surgery and patients not reporting surgery was statistically significant (P < .05) for almost all subcategories.
Conclusion: The most common complaints in negative reviews of Otolaryngologists on Yelp are non-clinical, primarily centered around the professionalism of the physician and staff. This work offers insights into patient satisfaction within Otolaryngology. Considerations should be given to these results as a means for improvement in patient experiences.
Keywords: Bedside manner; Online; Patient satisfaction; Ratings; Reviews; Yelp.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.