Which antiseptic to use for a caesarean section? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

L S Aho Glele; E Simon; C Bouit; M Serrand; L Filipuzzi; P Sagot; K Astruc; P Kadhel

doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.021

Which antiseptic to use for a caesarean section? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Hosp Infect. 2024 Apr 28:148:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.021. Online ahead of print.

Authors

L S Aho Glele¹, E Simon², C Bouit², M Serrand², L Filipuzzi², P Sagot², K Astruc³, P Kadhel²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France. Electronic address: Ludwig.aho@chu-dijon.fr.
² Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
³ Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.

PMID: 38688391
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.021

Abstract

Guidelines for pre-operative skin antisepsis recommend using chlorhexidine in an alcohol-based solution. However, other antiseptics such as aqueous povidone-iodine or alcohol-based solutions continue to be used. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in caesarean section are rare and do not include all possible comparisons of antiseptics. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy (reduction of surgical site infections) of chlorhexidine at two different concentrations (0.3% and 2%) and povidone-iodine in aqueous or alcohol-based solutions using a network meta-analysis, including only RCTs of caesarean sections. Fragility indices and prediction intervals were also estimated. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were performed. RCTs published up to February 2024 were collected from PubMed, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library. Interventions included alcohol-based povidone-iodine, aqueous povidone-iodine, and alcohol-based chlorhexidine 2% and 0.3%. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. Nine RCTs with 4915 patients and four interventions were included in the network meta-analysis. All credible intervals of the compared interventions overlapped. Alcohol-based 2% chlorhexidine had the highest probability of being effective in preventing surgical site infections, followed by alcohol-based povidone-iodine. The fragility index ranged from 4 to 18. The prediction intervals were wide. On the basis of rank probabilities, chlorhexidine 2% in an alcohol-based solution was most likely to be effective in preventing surgical site infections after caesarean section, followed by alcohol-based povidone-iodine. Given the paucity of literature and the relatively small difference between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine found in our meta-analysis, we suggest that either can be used in an alcohol-based solution as antisepsis for planned or emergency caesarean section.

Keywords: Antiseptics; Caesarean section; Chlorhexidine; Network meta-analysis; Povidone–iodine; Surgical site infection.

Publication types

Review