To study the value of the newly introduced multiplane transesophageal transducer technology for the assessment of prosthetic valve regurgitation, 63 consecutive patients with 35 mitral and 33 aortic prostheses (23 bioprostheses and 45 mechanical prostheses) were examined. Transvalvular, paravalvular, and, in mechanical valves, normal or pathological transvalvular regurgitation were identified using first 0 degrees (transverse) and 90 degrees (longitudinal) planes combined with flexion of the echoscope tip and then additionally using multiple intermediary planes by transducer rotation. In a subgroup of 20 patients interobserver variability was evaluated. Both methods showed regurgitation in 56/58 valves; one additional case of regurgitation was seen by multiplane imaging only. However, there were 19 cases of regurgitation not clearly classifiable by biplane technique compared to only three using multiplane technique. Grading of severity was concordant by both modalities in 66 and discordant in only two cases. Observers disagreed on severity in 2/20 cases based on biplane imaging, but in none based on multiplane imaging; classification of regurgitation differed in 6/20 biplane and 1/20 multiplane images respectively.
Conclusion: Multiplane transesophageal imaging improves classification of prosthetic regurgitation, but has little effect on severity grading.