Should selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy be part of surgical staging for endometrial cancer?

Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Oct;55(1):51-5. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1246.

Abstract

Surgical staging of adenocarcinoma of the endometrium attempts to identify the true distribution of disease. The survival value of paraaortic lymphadenectomy selectively performed in patients with histologic risk factors is unproven. The objective of this study was to determine if a staging procedure that did not include paraaortic lymphadenectomy predicted recurrence-free survival in disease surgically confined to the uterus. Between 1978 and 1990, 273 patients underwent surgical staging. Two hundred and sixty-nine were clinical stage I and 4 were stage II. The staging procedure included peritoneal cytology, TAH and BSO, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Postoperative therapy, if any, consisted of whole pelvis and vault radiotherapy in disease confined to the uterus and systemic chemotherapy in patients with extrauterine disease. Surgical staging resulted in 220 (81%) stage I, 20 (7%) stage II, 27 (10%) stage III, and 6 (2%) stage IV. Eighty-eight patients in stages I and II had deep myometrial invasion or a grade 3 tumor. There were 12 recurrences, 8 in stage I and 4 in stage II, in patients with disease confined to the uterus. Four patients (1.7%) recurred outside the pelvis. Had paraaortic lymphadenectomy been performed in patients with risk factors, this would have mandated 88 dissections to potentially benefit 4 patients. We conclude that paraaortic lymphadenectomy would have been of small benefit to these surgically staged patients.

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology*
  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Aorta
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymph Node Excision*
  • Lymph Nodes
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pelvis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors