Purpose: The first 5-year review of the Medicare Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) work values (RVUs) began in 1995, and adjustments became effective January 1, 1997. This report summarizes the methods used by The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter, (ISCVS-NA) Joint Council Government Relations Committee (GRC) to evaluate vascular surgery work RVUs and the results that were achieved.
Methods: The GRC performed a work study to determine accurate skin-to-skin operative times for typical vascular and nonvascular operations. These were compared with the original Harvard/Hsiao time estimates and intraservice work per unit time (IWPUT) values that had been used to determine work RVUs. For most vascular procedures the current operative times were longer than the original Harvard estimates, resulting in calculated IWPUTs substantially less than the Harvard values. This lack of correspondence was not identified in the nonvascular procedures, where operating room times and IWPUT values were more consistent with Harvard data. These study results were then used to support compelling evidence arguments in a petition to the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) that identified vascular surgery as being undervalued in the RBRVS. Nine commonly performed vascular procedures were cited for review in the 5-year update, and five distinct work analysis methods were used to justify each recommended RVU increase. These techniques included a standardized survey from the American Medical Association (AMA)/Specialty Society Relative Value Update Committee (RUC), a work calculation using accurate intraservice times and appropriate IWPUT values, and an evaluation and management (E&M) building-block approach.
Results: The RUC met throughout 1995 to assess codes submitted for review, and recommendations were forwarded to HCFA. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), which contained HCFA's preliminary RVU determinations, was released in May 1996. RVU increases from 11.5% to 44.6% were proposed for the nine vascular services cited by the SVS/ISCVS-NA. Also included were two increases and two reductions in less-common vascular operations. Of far greater overall fiscal import, HCFA proposed substantial increases in the work RVU for all E&M except that performed within global surgical packages. The SVS/ISCVS and most other surgical societies appealed HCFA's proposal regarding E&M. The Final Rule for the 1997 Medicare Fee Schedule was published late in 1996.
Conclusions: The Final Rule upheld the 11 vascular work value improvements and the E&M increases that excluded global service packages. Because most surgical E&M is performed within 10- or 90-day global periods, the E&M ruling will produce an estimated annual $2.5 billion shift from surgical to nonsurgical specialties. Because the overall fiscal impact of the 5-year review was mandated to be budget-neutral, HCFA imposed an 8.3% reduction in the work payment of every service in Part B of the Medicare program, primarily to compensate for the increased nonsurgical E&M payments. The net fiscal impact of the 5-year review for vascular surgery has been estimated at +0.5%.