Helper T-lymphocyte count. TRAx CD4 test kit versus conventional flow cytometry

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Sep;121(9):960-2.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system for measuring helper T-lymphocyte count.

Methods: Data from 111 human immunodeficiency virus-infected injection drug users in a cohort study were analyzed by flow cytometry and independent duplicate runs of the TRAx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: The mean helper T-cell counts were 470, 480, and 506 per microliter by flow cytometry and TRAx runs 1 and 2, respectively. The correlation coefficients for TRAx runs 1 and 2 with the flow cytometry results as the dependent variable were .93 and .91, respectively. A cross-tabulation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay helper T-lymphocyte counts with flow cytometry counts showed agreement of 71% and 76% when the flow count was between 201 and 500, and 88% and 90% when it was greater than 500 cells per microliter. In those samples with 200 or fewer helper T cells, agreement was 73% and 41% for each TRAx run.

Conclusions: The TRAx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system is an acceptable method for measuring helper T-lymphocyte count, but should be recalibrated for better performance at helper T-cell counts below 200 per microliter.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count / methods*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / instrumentation*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Flow Cytometry / methods*
  • HIV Infections / immunology
  • Humans
  • Lymphocyte Subsets*
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic*
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous
  • T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer*

Substances

  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic