Diagnosing autism: analyses of data from the Autism Diagnostic Interview

J Autism Dev Disord. 1997 Oct;27(5):501-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1025873925661.

Abstract

Results from ROC curves of items from two scales, the Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), operationalizing DSM-IV criteria for autism are presented for 319 autistic and 113 other subjects from 8 international autism centers. Analyses indicate that multiple items were necessary to attain adequate sensitivity and specificity if samples with varying levels of language were considered separately. Although considering only current behavior was generally sufficient when a combination cutoff and additive model was employed, predictive power was highest when history was taken into account. A single set of criteria, as operationalized by individually structured questions in the ADI/ADI-R, was effective in differentiating autism from mental handicap and language impairment in subjects with a range of chronological ages and developmental levels.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Algorithms
  • Autistic Disorder / diagnosis*
  • Autistic Disorder / psychology
  • Child
  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive / diagnosis
  • Child, Preschool
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intellectual Disability / diagnosis
  • Intellectual Disability / psychology
  • Intelligence / classification
  • Intelligence Tests / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / statistics & numerical data*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity