In-stent restenosis has become a significant clinical problem. In 1997 alone, it is estimated that up to 100,000 patients world-wide with in-stent restenosis were treated. Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis has shown that tubular-slotted stents almost never chronically recoil and that neointimal hyperplasia is responsible for in-stent restenosis. With the rapid recent explosion in stent use, information about in-stent restenosis has lagged behind, especially on the impact of new stent designs. For example, the true prevalence of in-stent restenosis (1) varies with the lesion and patient subset, being much higher in the "real world" than in the selected patients typically enrolled in many studies; and (2) depends on its definition (i.e., clinical vs angiographic, intralesion vs in-stent). "Conventional" catheter-based treatments have included percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), rotational atherectomy, excimer laser coronary angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, and additional stent implantation. Rates of recurrence with these approaches are not known and vary considerably among series; however, certain lesions seem likely to recur regardless of the treatment modality. Recently, brachytherapy has emerged as the most promising way to treat in-stent restenosis.