Mechanical dysfunction of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage following cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and its relation to total electrical energy used for cardioversion

Am J Cardiol. 1998 May 1;81(9):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00141-6.

Abstract

In 39 patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF), we examined the effect of total electrical energy used for cardioversion on postcardioversion peak left atrial (LA) rapid filling velocity (A) and the atrial emptying fraction, and recovery of LA effective mechanical atrial function (defined as peak A velocity > or = 0.50 m/s), as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. In a subset of 27 patients who underwent pre- and postcardioversion transesophageal echocardiography, we assessed the relation between total electrical energy and LA appendage filling and emptying velocities and spontaneous echo contrast. Patients were randomized to receive an initial shock of 1.5 J/kg based on body weight, or 2.5, 3.5, 5 J/kg, or 360 J, followed sequentially by higher shock intensities until sinus rhythm was achieved. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on quartiles of total energy delivered for cardioversion. Conversion to sinus rhythm was associated with a significant decrease in the LA appendage filling velocities (0.42 +/- 0.20 m/s vs 0.29 +/- 0.14 m/s; p = 0.002) and LA appendage emptying velocities (0.40 +/- 0.22 m/s vs 0.29 +/- 0.18 m/s; p = 0.03), but no change in the incidence of spontaneous echo contrast (61% vs 70%, p = 0.08). The 4 groups of patients did not differ with respect to postcardioversion LA appendage filling velocities, LA appendage emptying velocities, incidence of spontaneous echo contrast, or worsening of spontaneous echo contrast. Similarly, the change in LA appendage filling and emptying velocities associated with cardioversion was not different between the groups. Furthermore, postcardioversion peak A velocity and atrial emptying fraction and recovery of effective mechanical atrial function were similar between the 4 groups. These results suggest that in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF, the total electrical energy used for cardioversion has no effect on the mechanical function of the left atrium or LA appendage following cardioversion.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Atrial Function, Left*
  • Electric Countershock*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged