The antitumour activity of the investigational agent N-L-leucyl-doxorubicin (Leu-DOX) was compared with that of doxorubicin (DOX) in human tumour xenografts growing subcutaneously in athymic nude mice. Leu-DOX was developed as a prodrug of DOX, and may be converted into the clinically active parent compound by hydrolytic enzymes present in or on tumour cells. It has been suggested that a better therapeutic index with a reduced cardiac toxicity and higher efficacy might be obtained. Both compounds were administered intravenously weekly for 2 weeks, each at maximum tolerated doses of 8 mg/kg and 28 mg/kg for DOX and Leu-DOX, respectively. The panel of xenografts represented three different tumour types. Leu-DOX showed antitumour activity, defined as tumour growth inhibition > 50% and specific growth delay > 1.0, in 10 of the 16 tumours, including two of five breast, five of seven small cell and three of four non-small cell lung carcinomas. In comparison, DOX was active in one breast, four small cell lung and two lung adenocarcinoma xenografts. In all the DOX sensitive lung tumours, Leu-DOX showed higher efficacy than the parent compound. Based on the results of the present study, and since phase I clinical trials with Leu-DOX have already been performed, phase II clinical evaluation of Leu-DOX in patients with breast and lung cancer is recommended.