Legislative issues facing pediatric ophthalmology in 2006

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;17(5):441-6. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000243019.74757.20.

Abstract

Purpose of review: There has been a surge in legislative activity concerning children's vision in recent years. This review will summarize and compare newly enacted state statutes and review legislation that has been introduced at both the state and federal level. Detailed reference sites are provided and may be a useful resource for those involved in legislative advocacy.

Recent findings: The legislative arena has often mirrored the disparate views of ophthalmology and optometry regarding the most appropriate methods for identifying vision problems in young children. While state legislation mandating comprehensive eye examinations for all asymptomatic and risk free children was passed in Kentucky in 2000, no other state since has successfully enacted and implemented similar legislation. In contrast, numerous states, have enacted mandatory preschool vision screening legislation. Federal legislation, introduced separately by ophthalmology and optometry, would provide funds for uninsured children's eye exams, but the two bills have important differences in eligibility requirements. Issues such as eye safety and retinoblastoma detection have also been addressed through the legislative process.

Summary: There has been a myriad of state and federal legislative activity in the area of children's vision. The momentum is likely to continue as additional states file new legislation.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Ophthalmology / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Pediatrics / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Vision Screening / legislation & jurisprudence*