Microcoaxial torsional cataract surgery 1.8 mm versus 2.2 mm: functional and morphological assessment

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;42(2):114-24. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110125-03. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Abstract

Background and objective: To compare functional and morphological outcomes of 1.8-mm versus 2.2-mm microincision coaxial cataract surgery (MCCS).

Patients and methods: Thirty eyes of 30 patients that underwent MCCS were randomized to two groups: 1.8-mm MCCS (group 1: 15 eyes) and 2.2-mm MCCS (group 2: 15 eyes).

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, keratometric astigmatism, and endothelial cell count. One day postoperatively, a greater increase of corneal thickness at the incision site was observed in group 1 compared to group 2 using anterior segment optical coherence tomography with no significant differences in tunnel morphometric features and confocal microscopy showed more tunnel edema in group 1 versus group 2 that resolved in both groups.

Conclusion: Both 1.8- and 2.2-mm torsional MCCS were safe and efficient with easy surgical maneuvers and excellent functional and morphological results; 1.8-mm MCCS induced slightly greater tunnel edema shortly after surgery that resolved in the medium term.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Astigmatism / etiology
  • Astigmatism / pathology
  • Cataract Extraction / adverse effects
  • Cataract Extraction / methods*
  • Cell Count
  • Cornea / pathology
  • Corneal Edema / etiology
  • Corneal Edema / pathology
  • Endothelium, Corneal / pathology
  • Eyeglasses
  • Humans
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Postoperative Period
  • Prospective Studies
  • Refraction, Ocular
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vision, Ocular
  • Visual Acuity