Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus combined intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone in diffuse diabetic macular oedema

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep-Oct;39(7):673-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02504.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

Abstract

Background: To compare the efficacy of a single injection of combined intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab (Avastin) with that of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with diffuse cystoid diabetic macular oedema.

Design: Prospective, non-randomized, masked, interventional case series.

Participants: Twenty-four eyes of 24 subjects with centre-involved diabetic macular oedema extending over two disc-areas with predominant cystic changes on spectral domain optical coherence tomography were selected.

Methods: Ten phakic and two pseudophakic, ocular hypertensive eyes received intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab as against 12 pseudophakic, normotensive eyes that received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.

Main outcome measures: Change in central macular volume on spectral domain optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity were measured at 6-week follow-up.

Results: Baseline data were matched in both groups. Post-injection central macular volume (7.46 ± 0.73 mm(3)) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide group when compared with its pre-injection central macular volume (9.11 ± 1.0 mm(3)) or when compared with the post-injection central macular volume (P = 0.02) of the intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab group (8.42 ± 1.18 mm(3)). However, post-injection best-corrected visual acuity between the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (0.65 ± 0.15 logMAR) and the intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab groups (0.685 ± 0.15 logMAR) was not significantly different (P = 0.06) at 6 weeks. No significant correlation was noted between change in central macular volume and change in best-corrected visual acuity (r = 0.35, P = 0.07) from the pooled data of both the groups. A fair correlation was noted between change in central macular volume and pre-injection central macular volume (r = 0.55, P = 0.005).

Conclusions: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may be more effective than intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab in reducing macular volume in patients with diffuse cystoid diabetic macular oedema. A significant reduction in macular volume does not necessarily translate into a correspondingly significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use*
  • Bevacizumab
  • Dexamethasone / therapeutic use*
  • Diabetic Retinopathy / diagnosis
  • Diabetic Retinopathy / drug therapy*
  • Diabetic Retinopathy / physiopathology
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glucocorticoids / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Macular Edema / diagnosis
  • Macular Edema / drug therapy*
  • Macular Edema / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Triamcinolone Acetonide / therapeutic use*
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Visual Acuity / physiology

Substances

  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Glucocorticoids
  • VEGFA protein, human
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
  • Bevacizumab
  • Dexamethasone
  • Triamcinolone Acetonide