Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083656. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of limbus-based (LBCF) compared with fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF) for trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled glaucoma.

Methods: A comprehensive literature meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify controlled clinical trials comparing LBCF with FBCF in trabeculectomy. The efficacy measures were the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR), the reduction in glaucoma medications, and the relative risks (RRs) for success rates. Tolerability estimates were measured by RR for adverse events. The pooled effects were calculated using the random effects model.

Results: Sixteen controlled clinical trials meeting the predefined criteria were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1,825 eyes from 1,392 patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma were included. The WMD of the IOPR from baseline was 1.12 (95% CI: -0.88 to 3.12) when comparing LBCF with FBCF. LBCF was associated with numerically greater but non-significant IOP lowering efficacy than FBCF (P = 0.270). LBCF was comparable with FBCF in the reduction of glaucoma medication, with a WMD of 0.15 (-0.05 to 0.36) at the follow-up endpoint (P = 0.141). The pooled RR comparing LBCF with FBCF were 1.08 (0.94, 1.23) for the complete success rate and 1.01 (0.92, 1.10) for the qualified success rate. Rates of adverse events did not differ significantly between LBCF and FBCF.

Conclusions: There is no significant difference in IOP lowering, number of glaucoma medications, or proportion of patients who reached the IOP target between LBCF and FBCF trabeculectomy. Both incision techniques may contribute equally to adverse events.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Conjunctiva / surgery*
  • Female
  • Glaucoma / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Limbus Corneae / surgery*
  • Male
  • Surgical Flaps*
  • Trabeculectomy* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371008). No additional external funding was received. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.