Determinants of long-term care services among the elderly: a population-based study in Taiwan

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089213. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate determinants of long-term care use and to clarify the differing characteristics of home/community-based and institution-based services users.

Design: Cross-sectional, population-based study.

Setting: Utilizing data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey conducted in Taiwan.

Participants: A national sample of 2,608 people (1,312 men, 1,296 women) aged 65 and older.

Measurements: The utilization of long-term care services (both home/community- and institution-based services) was measured. A χ(2) analysis tested differences in baseline characteristics between home/community-based and institution-based long-term care users. The multiple-logistic model was adopted with a hierarchical approach adding the Andersen model's predisposing, enabling, and need factors sequentially. Multiple logistic models further stratified data by gender and age.

Results: Compared with users of home/community-based care, those using institution-based care had less education (p = 0.019), greater likelihood of being single (p = 0.001), fewer family members (p = 0.002), higher prevalence of stool incontinence (p = 0.011) and dementia (P = .025), and greater disability (p = 0.016). After adjustment, age (compared with 65-69 years; 75-79 years, odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, p = 0.044; age ≥80, OR = 3.30, p = 0.002), being single (OR = 2.16, p = 0.006), urban living (OR = 1.68, p = 0.037), stroke (OR = 2.08, p = 0.015), dementia (OR = 2.32, p = 0.007), 1-3 items of activities of daily living (ADL) disability (OR = 5.56, p<0.001), and 4-6 items of ADL disability (OR = 21.57, p<0.001) were significantly associated with long-term care use.

Conclusion: Age, single marital status, stroke, dementia, and ADL disability are predictive factors for long-term care use. The utilization was directly proportional to the level of disability.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Home Care Services / standards
  • Home Care Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Homes for the Aged / standards
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Long-Term Care / methods*
  • Long-Term Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male
  • Nursing Homes / standards
  • Nursing Homes / statistics & numerical data*
  • Odds Ratio
  • Taiwan

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Education through its “Aim for the Top University Plan,” and by Taiwan’s National Science Council through Grant 98-2314-B-010-015-MY2. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.