Role of echography in diagnostic dilemma in choroidal masses

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;62(2):167-70. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.128626.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the role of echography in diagnosis and management of a diverse array of choroidal masses.

Materials and methods: Sixty-two cases of clinically suspected choroidal masses were prospectively analyzed with B-scan (10 Hz), A-scan, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) (50 Hz) after a meticulous history and ocular examination. Ancillary investigations and systemic evaluation were also done.

Results: Based on clinical suspicion, acoustic features, response to treatment, and other ancillary tests combined together, the various masses were differentiated. The cases included in the study were as follows: n = 10 malignant melanomas, n = 16 metastasis and infiltrations, n = 9 hemangioma, n = 7 tuberculoma, n = 8 nonspecific inflammatory masses, n = 2 disciform plaques, n = 4 macular cysts or retinoschisis, n = 2 Coat's disease, n = 1 melanocytoma, and n = 2 osteomas. Ultrasonography (USG) alone could identify n = 51 lesions, while UBM in combination with USG was needed in remaining 11 masses.

Conclusion: Standardized echography is an important adjunct in the diagnosis and management of eyes with intraocular masses. A better understanding of the clinicopathological and echographic picture of the diverse lesions can help in detection, differentiation, diagnosis, proposing a therapeutic approach, and also monitoring response to treatment. Echography is essential to evaluate tumors for extrascleral and anterior segment extension.

MeSH terms

  • Choroid / diagnostic imaging*
  • Choroid Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Humans
  • Microscopy, Acoustic / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies