Purpose: To compare the power of the 4 intraocular pressure (IOP) measures, that is, peak, mean, range, and SD, over a 24-hour period in predicting IOP variations in order to determine which measure of IOP fluctuation correlates best with actual office-hour readings in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
Methods: For this prospective study, 25 subjects with untreated primary open-angle glaucoma and 33 healthy individuals were hospitalized for 24 hours. Measurements of the subjects' IOP for both eyes were recorded with a Goldmann applanation tonometer every 3 hours in the sitting position during the daytime (9 AM to 9 PM) and with a TonoPen in both the sitting and supine positions for 24 hours. Only 1 eye was selected randomly per subject for the final analysis. The strength of association between the estimated values and the actual 24-hour IOP data in habitual body positions was analyzed using the coefficient of determination (R). The differences were calculated. The percentage of subjects with estimated IOP values falling within the cutoff values from the 24-hour data were assessed.
Results: The peak IOP was captured outside office hours in 57% of the young subjects, 75% in the elderly control group, and 52% of the glaucoma patients. The estimation of the strength of association for the mean IOP and peak IOP showed strong to moderate correlations (R range from 0.29 to 0.95) compared with the estimation of range and SD of IOP fluctuation, which demonstrated weak to moderate relationships (R range from 0.001 to 0.69). The percentage of significant cases mostly corresponded with the correlation.
Conclusions: With the combination of sitting and supine position readings during office hours, the study provides promising results in estimating the mean and peak IOP in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects; however, it showed little advantage in range and SD of IOP fluctuation.