Earlier Versus Later Augmentation with an Antipsychotic Medication in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Demonstrating Inadequate Efficacy in Response to Antidepressants: A Retrospective Analysis of US Claims Data

Adv Ther. 2018 Dec;35(12):2138-2151. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0838-2. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

Abstract

Introduction: There is little evidence regarding the most effective timing of augmentation of antidepressants (AD) with antipsychotics (AP) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who inadequately respond to first-line AD (inadequate responders). The study's objective was to understand the association between timing of augmentation of AD with AP and overall healthcare costs in inadequate responders.

Methods: Using the Truven Health MarketScan® Medicaid, Commercial, and Medicare Supplemental databases (7/1/09-12/31/16), we identified adult inadequate responders if they had one of the following indicating incomplete response to initial AD: psychiatric hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit, initiating psychotherapy, or switching to or adding on a different AD. Two mutually exclusive cohorts were identified on the basis of time from first qualifying event date to first date of augmentation with an AP (index date): 0-6 months (early add-on) and 7-12 months (late add-on). Patients were further required to be continuously enrolled 1 year before (baseline) and 1 year after (follow-up) index date. Patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder diagnoses were excluded. General linear regression was used to estimate adjusted healthcare costs in the early versus late add-on cohort, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, insurance type, medications, and ED visits or hospitalizations.

Results: Of the 6935 identified inadequate responders, 68.7% started an AP early and 31.3% late. At baseline, before AP augmentation, patients in the early add-on cohort had higher psychiatric comorbid disease burden (47.3% vs. 42.5%; p < 0.001) and higher inpatient utilization [mean (SD) 0.41 (0.72) vs. 0.27 (0.67); p < 0.001] than in late add-on cohort. During follow-up, the adjusted total all-cause healthcare cost was significantly lower in the early vs. late add-on cohort ($18,864 vs. $20,452; p = 0.046).

Conclusion: Findings of this real-world study suggest that, in patients with MDD who inadequately responded to first-line AD treatment, adding an AP earlier reduces overall healthcare costs.

Funding: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc. and Lundbeck.

Keywords: Antipsychotics; Augmentation therapy; Healthcare costs; Major depressive disorder; Neurology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antidepressive Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antidepressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antipsychotic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antipsychotic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bipolar Disorder / drug therapy
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / drug therapy*
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Insurance Claim Review
  • Male
  • Medicare
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Schizophrenia / drug therapy
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • United States

Substances

  • Antidepressive Agents
  • Antipsychotic Agents

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.7297541