[Does continuing medical education improve the way physicians conduct their practice?]

Presse Med. 1999 Mar 6;28(9):468-72.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objectives: Physicians practicing in France are required to participate in continuing education programs in accordance with the code of deontology and the official decree on controlling medical expenditures. We reviewed the literature to analyze the efficacy of such training on the way physicians conduct their practice.

Methods: We examined the following educational methodologies: diffusion of educational documents or guidelines, conferences and presentations, interventions by opinion leaders, direct visits at the physician's office. The analysis was based solely on publications issuing from work considered to be valid in accordance with the Cochrane collaboration: intervention trials, chronological series, before-after studies with control group.

Results: The diffusion of educational material or more formal continuing education programs do not appear to have an effect on the way physicians conduct their practice. Interventions by opinion leaders have a demonstrated impact but are rarely judged clinically significant. Visits to the physician's office by specially trained health care workers have an effect but this mode of education is costly.

Conclusions: The conventional strategies, such as simple information diffusion and continuing education programs, developed to promote an evolution of clinical practices appear to be the least effective methodologies.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Education, Medical, Continuing*
  • France
  • Humans
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Quality of Health Care