Poverty area residence and changes in depression and perceived health status: evidence from the Alameda County Study

Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):90-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.90.

Abstract

Background: Previous evidence from the Alameda County Study indicated that residential area has an independent effect on risk for mortality, adjusting for a variety of important individual characteristics. The current research examined the effect of poverty area residence on risk for developing depressive symptoms and decline in perceived health status in a sample of 1737.

Methods: Data were from a longitudinal population-based cohort. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used.

Results: Age- and sex-adjusted risk for incident high levels of depressive symptoms in 1974 was higher for poverty area residents (odds ratio [OR] 2.14; confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-3.06). Those reporting excellent/good health in 1965 were at higher risk for having fair/poor health in 1974 if they lived in a poverty area (age- and sex-adjusted OR 3.30; CI: 2.32-4.71). Independent of individual income, education, smoking status, body mass index, and alcohol consumption, poverty area residence remained associated with change in outcome variables.

Conclusion: These results further support the hypothesis that characteristics of place affect health conditions and health status.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • California / epidemiology
  • Depression / epidemiology*
  • Female
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Odds Ratio
  • Poverty / psychology
  • Poverty / statistics & numerical data*