Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;56(4):340-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.340.

Abstract

Background: We report a clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of education-based and peer discussion-based group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer.

Methods: Women with stage I, II, or III breast cancer (n = 312) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 group conditions: control, education, peer discussion, or education plus peer discussion (combination). Seven groups (each comprising 8-12 women) were conducted in each of the 4 conditions (28 groups total). Adjustment was measured before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Results: Consistently positive effects on adjustment were seen in the education groups both immediately following and 6 months after the intervention. There were no benefits of participation in peer discussion groups, and some indications of adverse effects on adjustment at both follow-up examinations. The effects could be explained by changes in self-esteem, body image, and intrusive thoughts about the illness.

Conclusions: Education-based group interventions facilitated the initial adjustment of women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. There was no evidence of benefits from peer discussion group interventions.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Attitude to Health
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Patient Education as Topic*
  • Peer Group*
  • Self-Help Groups*
  • Treatment Outcome