Background: Pulmonary embolism is one of the most frequent cardiopulmonary diseases, but it is often under- or misdiagnosed. In order to address this issue and to identify flow charts that are commonly used in pulmonary embolism diagnosis and treatment, 191 clinical wards of internal medicine, cardiology, geriatrics, pneumology and intensive care units, located in the Veneto Region, were surveyed.
Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to each ward in order to collect clinical diagnostic information on all pulmonary embolisms which occurred during 1993. Among the returned questionnaires, 114 (59.6%) had usable information for the analysis.
Results: The vast majority of participating centers reported in 1993 less than 10 pulmonary embolism events. No significant differences were observed between internal medicine, geriatrics, pneumology wards and intensive care units. The reported events, however, were slightly higher in the divisions of cardiology with an annual average of 12 events per center. First level diagnostic procedures, such as ECG, chest X-ray and arterial blood gas analysis were chosen and performed in all patients. Interestingly, Doppler echocardiography, which is often not included in official guidelines for pulmonary embolism diagnosis, was performed in 56% of the participating centers. On the contrary, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning, which is considered highly predictive in many diagnostic algorithms, was underutilized (35% perfusion scan, 20% ventilation scan). This underuse was probably due to technical and organizational difficulties. Pulmonary angiography, the most accurate procedure for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, was performed in 28% of the patients. During the acute phase, intravenous heparin was commonly used; 91% of patients received the infusion continuously, 4% intermittently. Thrombolysis was performed in 25% of the patients. The preferred drugs were recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (67%), followed by urokinase (20%) and streptokinase (13%). To start thrombolytic therapy, 20% of the interviewed clinicians considered sufficient the evidence of clinical manifestations of pulmonary embolism confirmed by echocardiographic data. At discharge, prescription of oral anticoagulant drugs was common (78%) for at least 6 months (47%). Standardized procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism were already implemented in 13% of the participating centers.
Conclusions: These data suggest a common effort to define unanimous conventional protocols in the management of pulmonary embolism. It should be underlined, however, that a particular attention to the clinical manifestations and a productive collaboration among clinicians with different expertise are required to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism.