Utility of a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jul;59(3):372-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10508.

Abstract

Renal ischemia due to renal artery stenosis (RAS) is an important cause of secondary hypertension and renal insufficiency. Several methods are available to diagnose RAS; however, the identification of clinically significant lesions remains problematic. We measured the translesional systolic pressure gradient (TSPG) with a 4 Fr catheter and a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire and compared these data to angiographic findings. The TSPG obtained by pressure-sensing guidewire correlated more strongly with angiographic minimal lumen diameter (r(2) = 0.801) than those obtained by 4 Fr catheter (r(2) = 0.360). The relationship of TSPG with percent stenosis was not strong, regardless of the method used (r(2) = 0.228 with pressure-sensing guidewire, 0.358 with 4 Fr catheter). Using a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire is effective for assessing TSPG and provides a more reliable indication of stenosis significance than use of a 4 Fr catheter.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography*
  • Blood Pressure Determination
  • Catheterization / instrumentation*
  • Catheterization / methods
  • Cohort Studies
  • Equipment Safety
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension, Renal / diagnosis*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pressure
  • Probability
  • Prospective Studies
  • Regression Analysis
  • Renal Artery Obstruction / diagnosis*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index