Use of erythropoietin in cancer patients: assessment of oncologists' practice patterns in the United States and other countries

Am J Med. 2004 Jan 1;116(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.06.004.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess physician use of erythropoietin in cancer patients before publication of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology guidelines.

Methods: Questionnaires about erythropoietin use in practice and 12 hypothetical clinical scenarios involving patients with cancer were mailed to 2000 oncologists/hematologists in the United States and 19 other countries. Response rates were 30% in the United States and 25% internationally. Data on erythropoietin use for ovarian cancer were obtained from one clinical trial. Multivariate regression models assessed predictors of erythropoietin prescription.

Results: Most physicians selected a hemoglobin level < or =10 g/dL as an upper threshold for erythropoietin use (36% to 51% of U.S. physicians and 21% to 32% of foreign physicians). Frequent erythropoietin use (defined as use in at least 10% of cancer patients) was higher in the United States than elsewhere (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 13.4). Among U.S. physicians, those who said they used erythropoietin frequently were more likely to be in fee-for-service than managed care settings (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.7). Those who reported never using erythropoietin practiced in countries that had lower annual per capita health care expenditures, lower proportions of privately funded health care, and a national health service (P <0.05 for all comparisons). Of 235 ovarian cancer patients who received topotecan, 38% (45/118) of U.S. patients and 2% (2/117) of European patients who developed grade 1 anemia (hemoglobin level between 10 and 12 g/dL) were treated with erythropoietin (P <0.01).

Conclusion: Financial considerations and a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL appear to influence erythropoietin use in the United States, whereas financial considerations alone determine erythropoietin use abroad.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Anemia / chemically induced
  • Anemia / drug therapy
  • Anemia / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cost Savings / statistics & numerical data
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Drug Utilization / statistics & numerical data
  • Erythropoietin / economics
  • Erythropoietin / therapeutic use*
  • Fee-for-Service Plans / economics
  • Fee-for-Service Plans / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data
  • Hemoglobinometry / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Managed Care Programs / economics
  • Managed Care Programs / statistics & numerical data
  • Medical Oncology / economics
  • Medical Oncology / statistics & numerical data*
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms / economics
  • Odds Ratio
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / economics
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / economics
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data*
  • Regression Analysis
  • Topotecan / adverse effects
  • Topotecan / therapeutic use
  • United States

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Erythropoietin
  • Topotecan