Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison to the open approach

Transplantation. 2004 Jul 15;78(1):168-71. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000134617.75420.e0.

Abstract

A purely retroperitoneoscopic approach in living kidney donation is used by only a few centers worldwide. Data from 28 consecutive purely retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomies (RLDN) were compared to the most recent 30 open living donor nephrectomies (OLDN). Right-sided donation was performed in 12 cases (43%) of the RLDN and 11 cases (37%) of the OLDN. Comparison of the results between the two groups showed a shorter operation time and hospital stay for the RLDN group (P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in the OLDN group (P < 0.02). The rate of complications did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant difference in terms of renal graft function was detected within 30 days after surgery. As a result of the direct access, RLDN is superior in terms of operation time, even to the open access on our series, while maintaining the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Laparoscopes
  • Living Donors*
  • Nephrectomy / methods*
  • Retroperitoneal Space / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome