Validity of primary care patient self-report of abnormal (but not cancer) prostate biopsy results

J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2366-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000145178.29852.7b.

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the validity of patient self-report of abnormal (but not cancer) prostate biopsy results, ie, atypical cells or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Materials and methods: We compared survey responses and pathology records for 156 men from a multicenter, prospective cohort study, which was designed to evaluate the impact of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by benign prostate biopsy.

Results: Of the 156 subjects 45 (29%) reported having had atypical cells or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and 38 (24%) had a pathology report with atypia or prostate intraepithelial neoplasia. The sensitivity of the self-report was 87%, specificity was 90%, positive predictive value was 73% and negative predictive value was 95%. The kappa statistic was 0.7.

Conclusions: Men in this study reported this complex result accurately. However, it was concerning that 5 men (13%) appeared unaware of an abnormal prostate biopsy result, especially given the substantial residual risk of prostate cancer conferred by this result.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy
  • Cohort Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostate / pathology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Disclosure
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*