Clinical relevance of automated drug alerts from the perspective of medical providers

Am J Med Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-14. doi: 10.1177/1062860604273777.

Abstract

The authors used a real-time survey instrument and subsequent focus group among primary care clinicians at a large healthcare system to assess usefulness of automated drug alerts. Of 108 alerts encountered, 0.9% (n = 1) represented critical alerts, and 16% (n = 17) were significant drug interaction alerts. Sixty-one percent (n = 66) involved duplication of a medication or medication class. The rest (n = 24) involved topical medications, inhalers, or vaccines. Of the 84 potentially relevant alerts, providers classified 11% (9/84), or about 1 in 9, as useful. Drug interaction alerts were more often deemed useful than drug duplication alerts (44.4% versus 1.5%, P < .001). Focus group participants generally echoed these results when ranking the relevance of 15 selected alerts, although there was wide variance in ratings for individual alerts. Hence, a "smarter" system that utilizes a set of mandatory alerts while allowing providers to tailor use of other automated warnings may improve clinical relevance of drug alert systems.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems*
  • Data Collection
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
  • Drug Interactions
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Los Angeles
  • Medical Records Systems, Computerized
  • Medication Errors / prevention & control*
  • Pharmacy Service, Hospital
  • Primary Health Care / methods*