A structured review of randomized controlled trials of weight loss showed little improvement in health-related quality of life

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):568-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.015. Epub 2005 Apr 18.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effect of weight-loss interventions on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); to conduct a meta-analysis of weight-loss treatment on depressive symptoms; and, to examine methodological and presentation issues that compromise study validity.

Study design and setting: We conducted a structured review of 34 RCTs with weight-loss interventions that reported the relationship between HrQoL and treatment at two or more time points. We also evaluated study quality.

Results: Trials lasted 6 weeks to 208 weeks and evaluated behavioral, surgical, or pharmacologic interventions. Nine of 34 trials showed HrQoL improvements in generic measures. Obesity-specific measures were more likely to show improvement in response to treatment than non-obesity-specific measures. Meta-analysis showed no treatment effect on depressive symptoms. Most trials tracked loss to follow-up and conducted intent-to-treat analysis, but only four trials concealed recruitment staff to randomization and 14 blinded the investigation team to randomization.

Conclusion: HrQoL outcomes, including depression, were not consistently improved in RCTs of weight loss. The overall quality of these clinical trials was poor. Better-designed RCTs using standardized HrQoL measures are needed to determine the extent to which weight loss improves HrQoL.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Depression / etiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity / psychology
  • Obesity / rehabilitation*
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Research Design
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight Loss*