Objective: National registration and analysis of unexpected side effects and incidents associated with blood transfusion (together termed 'transfusion reactions') in 2003 in order to arrive at recommendations to improve safety in the transfusion chain.
Design: Observational
Method: A uniform national reporting form with definitions and a reporting manual were sent to all Dutch hospitals in the spring of 2003 with the request to report transfusion reactions retroactively to January 2003 to the Dutch National Haemovigilance Office 'Transfusion reactions in patients' (TRIP). TRIP is an independent organisation managed by representatives of professional societies that are involved in blood transfusion. Each hospital was given a reporting code. The reports were in principle voluntary and anonymous with regard to both the patient and the attending physician. Transfusion reactions were assessed for severity as well as for the level of probability with which they could be ascribed to the transfusion.
Results: Reports were received from 82 (80%) of the hospitals; 9 hospitals informed the TRIP explicitly that there had been no transfusion reactions in 2003. A total of 267 reports were received. Of these, 803 (63%) were graded for severity and of these 803, 52 (6%) were grade 2 ('moderate to severe morbidity') or worse. In the categories involving possible infectious complications, there were 2 reports of bacterial contamination that were judged, on review, to be due 'with certainty' to the transfusion. 34 reports concerned transfusion of the wrong blood product, resulting in a total of 9 transfusion reactions (4 of grade 2). The total number of reports concerning 2003 was 1.6/1000 blood products.
Conclusion: The participation by the hospitals was high in the first year of national reporting, 2003. Most of the reports were of non-serious reactions known to be possible side effects of blood transfusion; 52 reports were rated as grade 2 or worse.