The changing practice of thoracic epidural analgesia in the United Kingdom: 1997-2004

Anaesthesia. 2006 Apr;61(4):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04549.x.

Abstract

The clinical governance framework and medico-legal climate in the United Kingdom has changed significantly in the past 7 years. We used a postal questionnaire to survey thoracic epidural practice in the United Kingdom in 1997 and repeated this survey in 2004. The response rate to both surveys was 59-60%. There has been considerable change in respect of taking specific consent for thoracic epidural analgesia (24% in 1997, 74% in 2004), awake epidural cannulation (40% in 1997, 84% in 2004), availability of an acute pain service (47% in 1997, 95% in 2004) and HDU-only nursing of patients (63% in 1997, 30% in 2004). Of the 2004 respondents, < 1% used the newer, less toxic local anaesthetics, 49% would consider inserting a thoracic epidural in patients receiving clopidogrel, and 34% would consider inserting a thoracic epidural in patients receiving both aspirin and clopidogrel. A central register of thoracic epidural complications would assist in further developing practice.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Analgesia, Epidural / ethics
  • Analgesia, Epidural / methods
  • Analgesia, Epidural / statistics & numerical data
  • Analgesia, Epidural / trends*
  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / trends
  • Pain, Postoperative / therapy*
  • Professional Practice / statistics & numerical data
  • Professional Practice / trends*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Local