General practitioners' management of lumbosacral radicular syndrome compared with a clinical guideline

Eur J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep-Dec;11(3-4):113-8. doi: 10.3109/13814780509178250.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current treatment policy of general practitioners (GPs) in patients with a lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) compared with their clinical guideline.

Design: A cross sectional survey.

Methods: Sixty-three GPs completed questionnaires about their treatment policy in individual LRS patients at baseline and at six months follow-up. Simultaneously, 136 LRS patients of these GPs were interviewed at baseline, and at three and six month's follow-up.

Results: Of the 12 recommendations in the guideline related to history taking, four were not adhered to by the GPs in about 25% of the patients. Of the ten recommended physical examinations, three are not frequently carried out by the GPs. Almost 40% of the patients were referred to physiotherapy and 27% received muscle relaxants.

Conclusion: The majority of the GPs support the content of the LRS guideline. Overall, there was a good adherence with the guideline for history taking and physical examination, and a moderate adherence for treatment policy.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Guideline Adherence*
  • Humans
  • Lumbosacral Region
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuromuscular Agents / therapeutic use
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Physicians, Family*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Radiculopathy / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Syndrome
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Neuromuscular Agents