Economic evaluation of alternative strategies to treat patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease

Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 19;97(12A):59G-65G. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Apr 7.

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease (CAD) commonly coexist, and thus effective, cost-effective management strategies are needed. Intensive management of diabetes has been shown to increase medical costs while yielding better outcomes, with an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio of <50,000 dollars per life-year added. On the basis of clinical trial findings in the 1970s and 1980s, coronary bypass surgery was cost-effective compared with medical therapy in the treatment of extensive CAD. Few trials have compared angioplasty with medical therapy, and its cost-effectiveness is not well established. The economic outcomes of contemporary coronary revascularization, especially angioplasty, compared with contemporary medical therapy must be evaluated. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial will collect extensive economic data and examine the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies to manage diabetes and CAD in patients with both disorders.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / economics
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / economics
  • Coronary Artery Disease / complications
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / complications
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / economics
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / economics
  • Myocardial Revascularization / economics
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • United States

Substances

  • Hypoglycemic Agents