New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 1;31(25):E934-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000247956.00599.a3.

Abstract

Study design: A new rod-plate anterior implant was designed to provide plate fixation at the cephalad and caudal-end segments of a 5-level anterior spine construct. Biomechanical testing was performed on calf spines instrumented with 5-segment anterior scoliosis constructs. OBJECTIVES.: To analyze the initial and post-fatigue biomechanical performance of the new implant, and compare it to an anterior dual-rod construct and a single-rod construct with interbody cages.

Summary of background data: Using single-rod anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis, an unacceptable incidence of loss of correction, segmental kyphosis, and pseudarthrosis has been reported. Inadequate construct stiffness due to early postoperative bone-screw interface failure, especially at cephalad and caudal-end vertebrae, has been implicated as the cause of these complications.

Methods: Thirty calf spines were instrumented over 5 segments with: (1) single-rod augmented with rod-plate implants, (2) dual-rod construct, and (3) single-rod with titanium mesh cages. Stiffness in flexion-extension and lateral bending modes was determined initially and post-cyclical loading by measuring segmental range of motion (ROM). Post-fatigue screw pullout tests were also performed.

Results: In lateral bending, the caudal-end segmental ROM for rod-plate construct was 54% less than single-rod with cages construct (P < 0.05), with no difference between rod-plate and dual-rod constructs. In flexion-extension, the rod-plate construct showed 45% to 91% (initial test) and 84% to 90% (post-fatigue) less ROM than the single-rod with cages construct (P < 0.001). Again, there was no difference between rod-plate and dual-rod constructs at the cephalad and caudal-end segments. Post-fatigue screw pullout strengths of the rod-plate construct were significantly greater than those of the dual-rod and single-rod with cages constructs (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The rod-plate construct was significantly stiffer and provided greater stability of bone-screw interface than the single-rod with cages construct. It achieved similar stiffness and improved bone-screw interface stability compared to dual-rod construct.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / methods
  • Bone Nails* / standards
  • Bone Plates* / standards
  • Cattle
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Materials Testing / methods
  • Materials Testing / standards
  • Scoliosis / physiopathology
  • Scoliosis / surgery*
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation
  • Spinal Fusion / methods
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / physiology
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / surgery*