A randomized controlled study comparing educational outcomes of examination room versus conference room staffing

Teach Learn Med. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):218-24. doi: 10.1080/10401330802199484.

Abstract

Background: This prospective randomized controlled study examined outpatient clinical teaching in the presence of the patient.

Methods: In 2006, patients in ambulatory internal medicine clinics at the University of Iowa were randomized to have faculty-learner presentations either in their presence or in the conference room. Staffing encounters were timed and faculty, learners and patients completed postencounter surveys.

Results: Participation included 254 patients and 12 faculty. Comparison of patient encounters randomized to exam room (n = 120) or conference room (n = 134) staffing demonstrated increased time spent with the patient in exam room staffing (91% vs. 54% of total staffing time; p < .0001) but no significant differences in mean total staffing time. Patients, learners, and faculty preferred exam room staffing.

Conclusions: Concerns about time efficiency and patient and learner satisfaction during exam room staffing were not supported. This approach may allow attending physicians to maximize billing levels while increasing learner/patient involvement.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care
  • Clinical Competence
  • Education, Medical / methods*
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Internal Medicine / education*
  • Iowa
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling*
  • Physical Examination*
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Prospective Studies