Complete versus partial distal embolic protection during renal artery stenting

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):725-30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21932.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether complete embolic protection is superior to partial embolic protection for preservation of kidney function during renal artery angioplasty and stenting.

Background: Renal artery angioplasty and stenting (RAAS) is a common treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. However, RAAS may be complicated by peri-procedural loss of kidney function.

Methods: In total, 44 patients were randomized to embolic protection devices (EPD) use; 25 complete and 19 partial embolic protection. These patients were further randomized to receive abciximab (n = 23) or placebo (n = 21). [corrected] MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR), was used as the primary measure of renal function. Creatinine was measured by a modified Jaffe reaction using the IDMS-traceable assay. The primary endpoint was the percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 month following stent placement.

Results: There was no difference in percent change eGFR at 1 month between complete or partial protection (-4 +/- 25 vs. +3 +/- 30, P = 0.45). Abciximab was associated with a net improvement in eGFR when compared with placebo (+0.5 +/- 27 vs. -11 +/- 20, P = 0.04). On subgroup analysis, the use of abciximab was associated with significantly improved eGFR in the partial distal embolic protection group (+14 +/- 33 vs. -17 +/- 13 %, P = 0.018) but not in the complete distal embolic protection group (+2.5 +/- 26 vs. -11 +/- 24, P = 0.42), however, there was no interaction between completeness of protection and abciximab on eGFR (P = ns). Capture of embolic material was more likely with complete protection when compared with those receiving partial protection (51% vs. 21%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Complete protection was superior to partial protection for the capture of athermanous debris during renal artery stenting. However, this was not associated with improved renal function. Importantly, Abciximab conferred a benefit for renal function that was independent of the degree of embolic protection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00234585.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Abciximab
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / adverse effects*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / instrumentation*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use
  • Creatinine / blood
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Embolism / etiology
  • Embolism / prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Renal Artery Obstruction / blood
  • Renal Artery Obstruction / physiopathology
  • Renal Artery Obstruction / therapy*
  • Renal Insufficiency / blood
  • Renal Insufficiency / etiology
  • Renal Insufficiency / physiopathology
  • Renal Insufficiency / prevention & control*
  • Stents*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Creatinine
  • Abciximab

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00234585