Anaesthesia for phacosemulsification surgery: is it as comfortable as we think?

J Perioper Pract. 2010 Jan;20(1):30-3. doi: 10.1177/175045891002000105.

Abstract

We report an observational prospective study to determine which local anaesthetic technique gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification (cataract) surgery. 1835 patients were recruited. 61.8% were female. Peribulbar (18.2%), subtenons (28.6%), and topical (53.2%) anaesthesia was used. The pain score was assessed by the visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) which ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain). The lowest mean pain score occurred in the subtenons group, mean VAPS 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.3). The mean pain scores for topical and peribulbar anaesthesia were 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.41-0.76) respectively. Subtenons anaesthesia gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification. Patients experienced more discomfort with 2nd eye surgery. Older patients and males had a higher pain threshold in all three anaesthetic groups.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anesthesia, Local / methods*
  • Anesthesia, Local / psychology
  • Attitude to Health
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intraocular
  • Intraoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Intraoperative Complications / etiology
  • Intraoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Intraoperative Complications / psychology
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Middle Aged
  • Nursing Methodology Research
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Pain / etiology
  • Pain / prevention & control*
  • Pain / psychology
  • Pain Measurement
  • Phacoemulsification / adverse effects*
  • Phacoemulsification / psychology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome