Peer-facilitated cognitive dissonance versus healthy weight eating disorders prevention: A randomized comparison

Body Image. 2010 Sep;7(4):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

Abstract

Research supports the efficacy of both cognitive dissonance (CD) and healthy weight (HW) eating disorders prevention, and indicates that CD can be delivered by peer-facilitators, which facilitates dissemination. This study investigated if peer-facilitators can deliver HW when it is modified for their use and extended follow-up of peer-facilitated CD as compared to previous trials. Based on pilot data, we modified HW (MHW) to facilitate peer delivery, elaborate benefits of the healthy-ideal, and place greater emphasis on consuming nutrient dense foods. Female sorority members (N=106) were randomized to either two 2-h sessions of CD or MHW. Participants completed assessment pre- and post-intervention, and at 8-week, 8-month, and 14-month follow-up. Consistent with hypotheses, CD decreased negative affect, thin-ideal internalization, and bulimic pathology to a greater degree post-intervention. Both CD and MHW reduced negative affect, internalization, body dissatisfaction, dietary restraint, and bulimic pathology at 14 months.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anorexia Nervosa / prevention & control
  • Anorexia Nervosa / psychology
  • Body Image
  • Body Weight*
  • Bulimia Nervosa / prevention & control
  • Bulimia Nervosa / psychology
  • Cognitive Dissonance*
  • Diet, Reducing / psychology
  • Exercise / psychology
  • Feeding Behavior / psychology
  • Feeding and Eating Disorders / prevention & control*
  • Feeding and Eating Disorders / psychology*
  • Female
  • Food Preferences / psychology
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training
  • Nutritive Value
  • Peer Group*
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Self-Help Groups*
  • Social Facilitation
  • Thinness / psychology
  • Young Adult