Adequate restoration of the mechanical alignment, anatomic reduction of the articular surface, and stable fixation allowing early motion of the elbow joint are the primary goals in the treatment of distal humeral fractures. The purpose of our study is the comparison of the effectiveness between distal humeral locking compression plates (LCP) and conventional reconstruction and one third tubular plates. Between January 2008 and January 2009, 11 consecutive patients (4 men and 7 women) with distal humeral fractures were treated with plates in our hospital; eight patients were treated with LCP distal humeral plates and three cases were fixed with a combination of 1/3 tubular plates and reconstruction plates. They were all followed up for 12 months using the functional score of Cassebaum and radiologically with standard X-rays. Good to excellent results were obtained in 6/11 patients with a mean range of motion of 115°. At this small cohort of patients no significant differences between the two fixation methods was identified regarding clinical outcome, complications and function of the affected limb.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.